{"id":71791,"date":"2026-10-26T16:03:45","date_gmt":"2026-10-26T14:03:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/?p=71791"},"modified":"2026-10-29T22:40:38","modified_gmt":"2026-10-29T20:40:38","slug":"amazon-price-controls-federal-court-of-justice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/magazine-en\/competition-law-antitrust-law\/amazon-price-controls-federal-court-of-justice\/","title":{"rendered":"Amazon\u2019s price controls before the BGH: what marketplace sellers need to know by January 2027"},"content":{"rendered":"
Anyone selling on amazon.de knows the problem: an offer drops out of the Featured Offer, often called the \u201cBuy Box\u201d, or is deactivated altogether because Amazon considers the price too high. Where exactly the limit lies is usually not disclosed to the seller. The German Federal Cartel Office (Bundeskartellamt) prohibited this practice on 4 February 2026 and ordered the disgorgement of around EUR 59 million in economic benefits. Amazon is challenging the decision before the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH). In press release no. 201\/2026 of 23 October 2026, the court\u2019s antitrust panel has now announced the first hearing date.<\/p>\n The Federal Cartel Office has prohibited Amazon from steering the prices of independent sellers on the German marketplace by means of so-called price control mechanisms. According to the authority\u2019s press release of 5 February 2026, Amazon checks the prices of marketplace sellers. If Amazon considers a price too high, the offer is either removed or excluded from the Featured Offer. Both lead to significant losses in sales for sellers, because a large share of purchases is made via this box.<\/p>\n The authority bases its decision on the special provision for large digital companies in Section 19a(2) of the German Act against Restraints of Competition (Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschr\u00e4nkungen, GWB)<\/a>, on the general prohibition of abuse in Section 19 GWB<\/a> and on Art. 102 TFEU<\/a>. It is already established with final effect that Amazon is of \u201cparamount significance for competition across markets\u201d within the meaning of Section 19a(1) GWB; the BGH had upheld that designation.<\/p>\n The core of the reasoning: Amazon is itself a retailer on its own marketplace and therefore a direct competitor of third-party sellers. Whoever controls the prices of its competitors can influence the price level of the entire platform. According to the Federal Cartel Office, amazon.de accounts for around 60 per cent of German online retail revenue from goods, and around 60 per cent of the goods sold there come from independent sellers. The authority considers less intrusive means possible, such as lower fees for sellers, if Amazon wants to promote low prices. It also criticises the lack of transparency: sellers cannot tell how the price limits are set or roughly where they lie.<\/p>\n Price controls are not banned entirely. According to the BGH press release, interventions remain permissible where a price is grossly disproportionate to the service, in particular in cases resembling usury, or where it violates other statutory pricing rules. For these cases, Amazon must inform sellers about how the mechanisms work, how often the thresholds are adjusted and what the consequences of a sanction are. Special requirements apply to notifications in individual cases.<\/p>\n Because, in addition to its appeal, Amazon has applied for an order granting the appeal suspensive effect, and the implementation deadlines are suspended until these interim proceedings have ended. This is how the BGH describes it in its press release. For sellers, this means that the price control mechanisms may continue to operate for the time being. A seller whose offer is deactivated today because of an allegedly excessive price cannot yet rely on the order of the Federal Cartel Office.<\/p>\n The BGH has jurisdiction because appeals against decisions under Section 19a GWB are heard not by a Higher Regional Court but directly by the antitrust panel of the BGH as the first and final instance (Section 73(5) GWB<\/a>). The legislator intended this to speed up proceedings against large digital companies. In the interim proceedings, the panel examines whether there are serious doubts as to the lawfulness of the order. Only then will it be clear whether Amazon must comply before the decision on the merits.<\/p>\n The first hearing will focus on Amazon\u2019s objection that the Federal Cartel Office lacked the power under EU law to issue the order. The panel has indicated that more than one hearing is planned. The substantive questions, namely whether the price controls are abusive, are likely to be addressed later.<\/p>\n The press release refers to Art. 1(6), second sentence, points (a) and (b) of the Digital Markets Act (Regulation (EU) 2022\/1925<\/a>), Art. 1(5)(c) and Art. 3(2) of the E-Commerce Directive 2000\/31\/EC and Section 3(2) and (4) no. 8 of the German Digital Services Act (Digitale-Dienste-Gesetz, DDG). Two fundamental questions are therefore at stake:<\/p>\n The answers reach beyond Amazon. They affect all proceedings of the Federal Cartel Office under Section 19a GWB, for example against Alphabet, Meta, Apple or Microsoft. If the BGH considers the EU law questions not to be clearly settled, a reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union is possible. That would prolong the proceedings considerably.<\/p>\n In addition to the prohibition, the Federal Cartel Office ordered Amazon to surrender around EUR 59 million in economic benefits. It is the first case in which the authority has used its power to disgorge economic benefits under Section 34 GWB<\/a>, which was reformed in 2023; since the reform, the benefit can be determined with the help of a statutory presumption. Because, in the authority\u2019s view, the infringement is ongoing, this is only a partial amount. This order is not final either.<\/p>\n For sellers, the amount is a signal: the authority assumes that Amazon has derived a measurable benefit from steering prices. The money, however, goes to the state and not to the sellers affected.<\/p>\n Even without an enforceable order of the Federal Cartel Office, sellers are not without rights. The most important basis is the P2B Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019\/1150<\/a>), which applies to online marketplaces in their relationship with business users:<\/p>\n If an offer\u2019s visibility is restricted because of an alleged breach of Amazon\u2019s policies, a duty to state reasons (Art. 17 DSA<\/a>) and the internal complaint-handling system for online platforms (Art. 20 DSA<\/a>) under the EU Digital Services Act may also apply.<\/p>\n Damages for unlawful price controls under Section 33a GWB<\/a> require an infringement of competition law. Under Section 33b GWB<\/a>, the findings of the Federal Cartel Office only bind the civil courts once the decision has become final. Until the BGH has ruled, a seller would have to set out and prove the infringement itself, which is difficult in practice. The limitation period for such claims is suspended while proceedings by the competition authority are pending (Section 33h(6) GWB<\/a>). Sellers therefore do not lose claims simply because they wait for the outcome.<\/p>\n For sellers on amazon.de, the situation will remain open until at least early 2027. This applies in particular to manufacturers and sellers from China, who make up a large share of third-party sellers on the German marketplace and often use dynamic pricing. For them, there is the additional question of whether a German authority may act at all against a platform operator based in Luxembourg. That is exactly what the BGH will hear in January.<\/p>\n Our recommendations:<\/p>\n Has Amazon deactivated your offer or removed it from the Featured Offer because of its price?<\/p>\n We review your rights against Amazon and enforce them, out of court or in urgent proceedings. You will usually receive an initial assessment within 24 hours.<\/p>\n Contact us now<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Germany\u2019s Federal Cartel Office has prohibited Amazon\u2019s price control mechanisms, but implementation is suspended pending interim proceedings. The Federal Court of Justice hears the case on 26 January 2027 (KVB 13\/26). What marketplace sellers should know and do now.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":71811,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":"Amazon price controls","_yoast_wpseo_title":"Amazon price controls at the BGH: what sellers must know %%sep%% %%sitename%%","_yoast_wpseo_metadesc":"Germany\u2019s Federal Cartel Office banned Amazon\u2019s price controls; the BGH hears Amazon\u2019s urgent application on 26 January 2027. What sellers should do.","show_overview":"1","footnotes":""},"categories":[19455],"tags":[20305,20510,21308,21512,21513,21514,21515,21516],"topic_category":[19442,19443],"class_list":["post-71791","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-competition-law-antitrust-law","tag-competition-law","tag-amazon-en","tag-amazon-seller","tag-amazon-price-controls","tag-section-19a-gwb","tag-buy-box-en","tag-federal-cartel-office","tag-p2b-regulation","topic_category-competition-law-antitrust-law","topic_category-verhandlungstrategie-prozesstaktik-en"],"acf":[],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71791","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71791"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71791\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":71913,"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71791\/revisions\/71913"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/71811"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71791"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71791"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71791"},{"taxonomy":"topic_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic_category?post=71791"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Amazon does not yet have to comply with the ban on its price control mechanisms on amazon.de. On 26 January 2027, the German Federal Court of Justice will hear Amazon\u2019s urgent application against the order of the Federal Cartel Office (case no. KVB 13\/26<\/a>). For marketplace sellers and manufacturers, including those from China, visibility, the Featured Offer and therefore revenue are at stake.<\/em><\/p>\n\n
What has the Federal Cartel Office prohibited?<\/h2>\n
Why does Amazon not yet have to implement the order?<\/h2>\n
What will the BGH hear on 26 January 2027?<\/h2>\n
\n
What does the EUR 59 million disgorgement mean?<\/h2>\n
What rights do sellers already have if an offer disappears because of its price?<\/h2>\n
\n
What does this mean for marketplace sellers and manufacturers, including those from China?<\/h2>\n
\n
Frequently asked questions on Amazon\u2019s price controls<\/h2>\n
May Amazon currently deactivate my offer because the price is too high?+<\/span><\/summary>\n
When will the BGH decide?+<\/span><\/summary>\n
Will I receive money from the EUR 59 million disgorgement?+<\/span><\/summary>\n
Does the decision also apply to sellers from China?+<\/span><\/summary>\n
What should I do now?+<\/span><\/summary>\n
Further information<\/h2>\n
\n