{"id":68068,"date":"2014-12-04T06:26:42","date_gmt":"2014-12-04T04:26:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/?p=68068"},"modified":"2024-10-22T16:40:06","modified_gmt":"2024-10-22T14:40:06","slug":"lhr-obtains-preliminary-injunction-against-google-due-to-autocomplete-function","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/magazine-en\/lhr-obtains-preliminary-injunction-against-google-due-to-autocomplete-function\/","title":{"rendered":"LHR obtains preliminary injunction against Google due to autocomplete function"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"googlebau\"At the request of Lampmann, Haberkamm & Rosenbaum Rechtsanw\u00e4lte (LHR), the Regional Court of Cologne (LG K\u00f6ln, Beschluss v. 26.11.2014, Az. 28 O 518\/14<\/a>) issued an interim injunction prohibiting Google from displaying the search term suggestions \u201cfraud\u201d or \u201csuspected fraud\u201d when certain search terms are entered as part of its so-called Autocomplete function.<\/p>\n

In the event of non-compliance, a fine of up to \u20ac 250,000 or up to six months’ imprisonment may be imposed. The decision was made by way of a ruling and without written reasons and is not yet legally binding.<\/p>\n

What is the \u201cAutocomplete function\u201d?<\/h2>\n

The autocomplete function works like this: While entering search terms into the \u201cGoogle\u201d search engine, users are automatically shown various search suggestions in the form of word combinations in a window that opens. According to Google<\/a>, the search suggestions displayed as part of this additional search function are determined using an algorithm that takes into account the number of search queries entered by other users and the content of indexed websites, among other things.<\/p>\n

Google deleted, but only incompletely<\/h2>\n

Google had made some modifications to the autocomplete function in response to corresponding requests, but only insufficiently. For example, the above-mentioned suggestions were still displayed if the letter \u201cb\u201d was entered in the search bar next to the first search word.<\/p>\n

The Regional Court of Cologne agreed with our client that this conduct also unlawfully interfered with the entrepreneur’s right of personality and must therefore be refrained from.<\/p>\n

Lawyer Arno Lampmann from the law firm LHR:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe decision of the Regional Court of Cologne is one of the first decisions in summary proceedings to put a stop to the seemingly overpowering search engine. It consistently implements the supreme court requirements of the BGH decision \u201cautocomplete\u201d (BGH, Urteil v. 14.05.2013, Az. VI ZR 269\/12<\/a>), which the Higher Regional Court of Cologne has already followed (OLG K\u00f6ln, v. 8.4.2014, Az. 15 U 199\/11<\/a>).\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

At the request of Lampmann, Haberkamm & Rosenbaum Rechtsanw\u00e4lte (LHR), the Regional Court of Cologne (LG K\u00f6ln, Beschluss v. 26.11.2014, Az. 28 O 518\/14) issued an interim injunction prohibiting Google from displaying the search term suggestions \u201cfraud\u201d or \u201csuspected fraud\u201d when certain search terms are entered as part of its so-called Autocomplete function. In the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":34105,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"content-type":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[19449,19453],"tags":[19525,20337,20482,20485],"class_list":["post-68068","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-magazine-en","category-media-law-personal-rights","tag-right-of-personality","tag-google-en","tag-application-for-a-temporary-injunction","tag-autocomplete-en"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68068","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68068"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68068\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":68069,"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68068\/revisions\/68069"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/34105"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68068"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68068"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lhr-law.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68068"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}